(Pity they didn’t tell George Bush that before the Gulf War.) (8) National solutions are
not adequate. (9) Coexistence is necessary.

HARVARD PSYCHOLOGICAL CLINIC Officials: Dr. Kurt Lewin and staff of 15
new-science scientists. Purpose: To create a climate where the Committee of 300 can take
unlimited power over the U.S.

INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH Officials: Dr. Kurt Lewin and staff of 20
new-science scientists. Purpose: To devise a whole new set of social programs to steer
America away from industry.

SCIENCE POLICY RESEARCH UNIT Officials: Leland Bradford, Kenneth Dam,
Ronald Lippert. Purpose: A “Future Shocks” research institution at Sussex University in
England and part of the Tavistock network.

SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Officials: Sheldon Arenberg and a staff
of hundreds, too numerous to mention here. Purpose: To coordinate all elements of the
intelligence communities of the U.S.A. and Britain. It analyzes what “play- ers” have to
be assigned the role of a national entity; for example, Spain would come under a supine
watered-down Catholic Church, the U.N. under the Secretary General and so forth. It
developed the system of “X RAY 2” where think tank personnel, military installations
and law enforcement centers are all linked to the Pentagon through a nation-wide
network of Teletypes and computers: To apply surveillance techniques on a nation-wide
scale. Arenberg says his ideas are non-military, but his techniques are mainly those he
learned from the military. He was responsible for the New York State Identification and
Intelligence System, a typical George Orwell “1984” project, which is completely illegal
under our Constitution. The NYSIIS system is in the process of being adopted
nationwide. It is what Brzezinsk referred to as the ability to almost instantaneously
retrieve data about any person. NYSIIS shares data with all law enforcement and government
agencies in the state. It provides storage and rapid retrieval of individual records,
criminal and social. It is a TYPICAL Committee of 300 project. There is a crying need
for a full investigation to be conducted into just what it is that Systems Development
Corporation is doing, but that is beyond the scope of this book. One thing is sure, SDC is
not there to preserve freedom and liberty guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. How
convenient that it should be located in Santa Barbara in easy reach of Robert Hutchins
“Parthenon.” Some publications put out by these Club of Rome institutions are as
follows:

“Center Magazine” “Counterspy” “Coventry” “Covert Action Information Bulletin”
“Dissent” “Human Relations” “Industrial Research” “Inquiry” “Mother Jones” “One”
“Progressive” “Raconteur” “The New Republic” “Working Papers for a New Society”

These are by no means all of the publications issued under the auspices of the Club of
Rome. There are many hundreds more, in fact each of the foundations puts out its own
publication. Given the number of foundations run by the Tavistock Institute and the Club
of Rome, a partial listing is all we can include here. Some of the more important

foundations and think tanks are in the following list, which includes Army think tanks.
The American public would be astounded if it only knew how deeply the Army is
involved in “new war tactics” research with Committee of 300 “think tanks.” Americans
are not aware that in 1946 the Club of Rome was ordered by the Committee of 300 to
further the progress of think tanks which it said offered a new means of spreading the
Committee’s philosophy. The impact of these think tanks upon our military, just since
1959 when they suddenly proliferated, is truly astounding. There is no doubt that they
will play an even greater role in the daily affairs of this nation as we come to the close of
the 20th century.

THE MONT PELERIN SOCIETY Mont Pelerin is an economic foundation devoted to
issuing misleading economic theories and influencing economists in the Western world to
follow models it lays out from time to time. Its leading practitioners are Von Hayek and
Milton Friedman.

THE HOOVER INSTITUTION Founded originally to fight Communism, the
institution has slowly but surely turned toward Socialism. It has an annual budget of $2
million, funded by companies under the umbrella of the Committee of 300. It now
concentrates on “peaceful changes” with emphasis on arms control and domestic U.S.
problems. It is Frequently used by the news media as a “conservative” organization
whose views they seek when a conservative viewpoint is needed. The Hoover Institution
is far from that, and following the 1953 takeover of the Institution by a group allied to the
Club of Rome, it has become a One World-New World Order outlet for “desirable”
policies.

HERITAGE FOUNDATION Founded by brewery magnate Joseph Coors to act as a
conservative think tank, Heritage was soon taken over by Fabianists Sir Peter Vickers
Hall, Stuart Butler, Steven Ayzlei, Robert Moss and Frederich Von Hayek under the
direction of the Club of Rome. This institute played a major role in carrying out British
Labour leader Anthony Wedgewood Benn’s order to “Thatcherize Reagan.” Heritage is
certainly not a conservative operation although at times it may look and sound like one.

HUMAN RESOURCES RESEARCH OFFICE. This is an Army research
establishment dealing in “psychotechnology.” Most of its personnel are Tavistocktrained.
“Psychotechnology” covers GI motivation, morale and music used by the enemy.
In fact a lot of what George Orwell wrote about in his book “1984” appears to be
remarkably similar to what is taught at HUMRRO. In 1969, the Committee of 300 took
over this important institution and turned it into a private non-profit organization run
under the auspices of the Club of Rome. It is the largest behavioral research group in the
U.S.

One of its specialities is the study of small groups under stress and HUMRRO teaches the
Army that a soldier is merely an extension of his equipment and has brought great
influence to bear on the “man/weapon” system and its “human quality control,” so widely
accepted by the United States Army. HUMRRO has had a very pronounced effect on
how the Army conducts itself. Its mind-bending techniques are straight out of Tavistock.

​

HUMRRO’S applied psychology courses are supposed to teach Army brass how to make

the human weapon work. A good example of this is the manner in which soldiers in the
war against Iraq were willing to disobey their field manual standing orders and bury
12,000 Iraqi soldiers alive.

This type of brainwashing is terribly dangerous because today, it is applied to the Army,
the Army applies it to brutally destroy thousands of “enemy” soldiers, and tomorrow the
Army could be told that civilian population groups opposed to government policies are
“the enemy.” We are already a mindless brainwashed flock of sheep, yet it seems that
HUMRRO can take mind bending and mind control a step further. HUMRRO is a
valuable adjunct to Tavistock and many of the lessons taught at HUMRRO were applied
in the Gulf War, which makes it a little easier to understand how it came to be that
American soldiers behaved as ruthless and heartless killers, a far cry from the concept of
the traditional American fighting man.

RESEARCH ANALYSlS CORPORATION. This is HUMRRO’S sister “1984”
organization situated in McLean, Virginia. Established in 1948, it was taken over by the
Committee of 3OO in 1961 when it became part of the Johns Hopkins bloc. It has worked
on over 600 projects, including integrating Negroes into the Army, the tactical use of
nuclear weapons, psychological warfare programs and mass population control.

Obviously there are many more major think tanks, and we shall come to most of them in
this book. One of the most important areas of cooperation between what think tanks turn
out and what becomes government and public policy are the “pollsters.” It is the job of
the polling companies to mold and shape public opinion in the way that suits the
conspirators. Polls are constantly being taken by CBS-NBC-ABC, the New York Times,
the Washington Post. Most of these efforts are coordinated at the National Opinion
Research Center where, as much as it will amaze most of us, a psychological profile was
developed for the entire nation.

Findings are fed into the computers of Gallup Poll and Yankelovich, Skelley and White
for comparative evaluation. Much of what we read in our newspapers or see on television
has first been cleared by the polling companies. WHAT WE SEE IS WHAT THE
POLLSTERS THINK WE SHOULD SEE. This is called “public opinion making.” The
whole idea behind this bit of social conditioning is to find out how responsive the public
is to POLICY DIRECTIVES handed down by the Committee of 300. We are called
“targeted population groups” and what is measured by the pollsters is how much
resistance is generated to what appears in the “Nightly News.” Later, we shall learn
exactly how this deceptive practice got started and who is responsible for it.

It is all part of the elaborate opinion-making process created at, Tavistock. Today our
people believe they are well-informed but what they do not realize is that the opinions
they believe are their own were in fact created in the research institutions and think tanks
of America and that none of us are free to form our own opinions because of the
information we are provided with by the media and the pollsters.

Polling was brought to a fine art just before the United States entered the Second World
War. Americans, unbeknown to themselves, were conditioned to look upon Germany and
Japan as dangerous enemies who had to be stopped. In a sense, this was true, and that
makes conditioned thinking all the more dangerous, because based on the
INFORMATlON fed to them, the enemy did indeed appear to be Germany and Japan.
Just recently we saw how well Tavistock’s conditioning process works when Americans
were conditioned to perceive Iraq as a threat and Saddam Hussein as a personal enemy of
the United States.

Such a conditioning process is technically described as “the message reaching the sense
organs of persons to be influenced.” One of the most respected of all pollsters is
Committee of 300 member Daniel Yankelovich, of the company, Yankelovich, Skelley
and White. Yankelovich is proud to tell his students that polling is a tool to change public
opinion, although this is not original, Yankelovich having drawn his inspiration from
David Naisbett’s book “TREND REPORT” which was commissioned by the Club of
Rome.

In his book Naisbett describes all of the techniques used by public opinion makers to
bring about the public opinion desired by the Committee of 300. Public opinion making
is the jewel in the crown of the OLYMPIANS, for with their thousands of new-science
social scientists at their beck and call, and with the news media firmly in their hands,
NEW public opinions on almost any subject can be created and disseminated around the
world in a matter of two weeks.

This is precisely what happened when their servant George Bush was ordered to make
war on Iraq. Within two weeks, not only the U.S. but almost the entire world public
opinion was turned against Iraq and its President Saddam Hussein. These media change
artists and news manipulators report directly to the Club of Rome which in turn reports to
the Committee of 300 at whose head sits the Queen of England ruling over a vast network
of closely-linked corporations who never pay taxes and are answerable to no one, who
fund their research institutions through foundations whose joint activities have almost
total control over our daily lives.

Together with their interlocking companies, insurance business, banks, finance
corporations, oil companies, newspapers, magazines, radio and television, this vast
apparatus sits astride the United States and the world. There is not a politician in
Washington D.C. who is not, somehow, beholden to it. The Left rails against it, calling it
“imperialism” which indeed it is, but the left is run by the same people, the very same
ones who control the right, so that the left is no more free than we are!

Scientists engaged in the process of conditioning are called “social engineers” or “newscience
social scientists” and they play an integral part in what we see, hear and read. The
“old school” social engineers were Kurt K. Lewin, Professor Hadley Cantril, Margaret
Meade, Professor Derwin Cartwright and Professor Lipssitt who, together with John
Rawlings Reese, made up the backbone of new-science scientists at Tavistock Institute.

During the Second World War, there were over 100 researchers at work under the
direction of Kurt Lewin, copying slavishly the methods adopted by Reinhard Heydrich of
the S.S. The OSS was based on Heydrich’s methodology and, as we know, the OSS was
the forerunner of the Central Intelligence Agency. The point of all this is that the
governments of Britain and the United States already have the machinery in place to
bring us into line in a New World Order with only a slight modicum of resistance
materializing, and this machinery has been in place since 1946. Each passing year has
added new refinements.

It is this Committee of 300 which has established control networks and mechanisms far
more binding than anything ever seen in this world. Chains and ropes are not needed to
restrain us. Our fear of what is to come does that job far more efficiently than any
physical means of restraint. We have been brainwashed to give up our Constitutional
right to bear arms; to give up our Constitution itself; to allow the United Nations to
exercise control over our foreign policies and the IMF to take control of our fiscal and
monetary policies; to permit the President to break United States law with impunity and
to invade a foreign country and kidnap its head-of-state. In short we have been
brainwashed to the extent where we, as a nation, will accept each and every lawless act
carried out by our government almost without question.

I for one know that we will soon have to fight to reclaim our country from the
Committee, or lose it forever. BUT when it comes right down to it, how many will
actually take up arms? In 1776 only 3% of the populace took up arms against King
George III. This time around, 3% will be woefully inadequate. We should not allow
ourselves to be led down dead-end roads, for that is what our mind controllers have
planned for us by confronting us with such a complexity of issues that we simply
succumb to long range penetration and make no decisions at all on many vital issues.

We shall be looking at the names of those who make up the Committee of 300 but, before
we do that, we should examine the massive interfacing of all important institutions,
companies and banks under the Committee’s control. We must mark them well because
these are the people who are deciding who shall live and who shall be eliminated as
“useless eaters”; where we will worship God, what we must wear and even what we shall
eat. According to Brzezinski, we shall be under endless surveillance around the clock for
365 days a year ad infinitum.

That we have been betrayed from within is being accepted by more and more people each
year, and that is good, because it is through knowledge, a word translated from the word
BELIEF, that we shall be able to defeat the enemies of all mankind. While we were being
distracted by the bogeymen in the Kremlin, the Trojan Horse was moved into position in
Washington D.C. The greatest danger free people face today is not from Moscow but
from Washington D.C. We need first to conquer the DOMESTIC ENEMY, and after that
we will be strong enough to mount an offensive to remove Communism from the earth

together with all of its attendant “isms.”

​

The Carter Administration accelerated the collapse of our economy and our military
strength, the latter begun by Club of Rome and Lucis Trust member Robert Strange
McNamara. In spite of his promises, Reagan continued to undermine our industrial base,
starting where Carter left off. While we need to keep our defenses strong, we cannot do
that from a weak industrial base for, without a well-run military-industrial complex, we
cannot have a viable defense system. The Committee of 300 recognizes this and planned
from 1953 its zerogrowth post-industrial policies now in full flower. Thanks to the Club
of Rome our technology potential has dropped below that of Japan and Germany, nations
we are supposed to have defeated in the Second World War. How has this come about?
Because of men like Dr. Alexander King and our blindfolded state of mind, we have
failed to recognize the destruction of our educational institutions and systems of teaching.
As a result of our blindness, we are no longer training engineers and scientist in sufficient
numbers to keep us among the industrialized nations of the world.

Thanks to Dr. King, a man very few people in America know about, education in the U.S.
is at its lowest level since 1786. Statistics produced by the Institute for Higher Learning
show that the reading and writing capabilities of high school children the United States
are LOWER than they were among high school children in 1786.

What we face today is not only the loss of our freedom and the very fabric of our nation,
but far worse, the possibility of the loss of our souls. The steady chipping away at the
foundation upon which this republic rests has left an empty void, which satanists and
cultists are rushing to fill with their synthetic soul material. This truth is difficult to
accept and appreciate because there was nothing SUDDEN about these events. If a
sudden shock were to hit us, a cultural and religious shock, we would be shaken out of
our apathy.

But gradualism–which is what Fabianism is, does nothing to raise the alarm. Because the
vast majority of Americans can see no MOTIVATION for the things I have described,
they cannot accept it, and so the conspiracy is scorned and often mocked. By creating
chaos through presenting hundreds of daily choices our people have to make, we have
come down to a position where, unless motivation can be clearly shown, all information
is rejected.

This is both the weak and the strong link in the conspiratorial chain. Most thrust aside
anything that has no motive, so the conspirators feel safe behind the ridicule poured upon
those who point to the coming crisis in our nation and our individual lives. However, if
we can get enough people to see the truth, the motivation block gets weaker until it will
eventually be forced aside as more and more people become enlightened and the notion
that “this cannot happen in America” is dispensed with.

The Committee of 300 is counting on our maladaptive responses to govern our reaction to
created events, and it will not be disappointed as long as we as a nation continue in the
present way we respond. We must turn responses to created crises into ADAPTIVE
responses by identifying the conspirators and ex-posing their plans for us, so that these
things become public knowledge. The Club of Rome has already made THE

TRANSITION TO BARBARISM. Instead of waiting to be “raptured,” we must stop the
Committee of 300 before it can accomplish its goal of making us prisoners of the” New
Dark Age” planned for us. It is not up to God, IT IS UP TO US. We have to take the
necessary action.

All information that I provide in this book comes from years of research backed up by
impeccable intelligence sources. Nothing is exaggerated. It is factual and precise so do
not fall into the trap set by the enemy that this material is “disinformation.” For the past
two decades I have provided information which has proved to be highly accurate and
which has explained a lot of puzzling events. My hope is that through this book, a better,
clearer and wider understanding of the conspiratorial forces ranged against this nation
will come about. That hope is being realized as more and more young people are
beginning to ask questions and seek information about what is REALLY going on.

It is difficult for people to comprehend that these conspirators are real and that they have
the power I and many others have attributed to them. Many have written to ask how it is
that our government does nothing about the terrible threat to civilization? The problem is
that our government is PART of the problem, part of the conspiracy, and nowhere and at
no time has this become more clearly evident than during the Bush Presidency. Of course
President Bush knows precisely what the Committee of 300 is doing to us. HE WORKS
FOR THEM. Others have written to say, “We thought we were fighting the government.”
Of course we are, but behind government stands a force so powerful and allencompassing
that intelligence agencies are even afraid to mention the name
“Olympians.”

Proof of the Committee of 300 is found in the vast number of powerful institutions
owned and controlled by it. Listed here are some of the more important ones, all of which
come under the MOTHER OF ALL THINK TANKS AND RESEARCH
INSTITUTIONS, THE TAVISTOCK INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RELATIONS with its
far-flung network of hundreds of “branches.”

​

STANFORD RESEARCH CENTER

Stanford Research Center (SRC) was founded in 1946 by the Tavistock Institute For
Human Relations. Stanford was created to help Robert 0. Anderson and his ARCO oil
company, who had secured for the Committee of 300 the oil rights on the North Slope of
Alaska. Basically, the job was too large for Anderson’s Aspen Institute to handle, so a
new center had to be founded and funded. That new center was Stanford Research
Center. Alaska sold its rights on a downpayment of $900 million, a relatively small
amount for the Committee of 300. The governor of Alaska was steered to SRI for help
and advice. This was no accident but the result of judicious planning and a process of
long-range conditioning.

Following the governor’s call for help, three SRI scientists set up shop in Alaska where
they met with the Alaskan Secretary of State and the State Planning Office. Francis
Greehan, who headed the SRI team, assured the Governor that his problem of how to
handle the rich oil find would be safe in the hands of SRI. Naturally Greehan did not
mention the Committee of 300 or the Club of Rome. In less than a month Greehan
assembled a team of economists, petroleum scientists and new-science sci-entists
numbering in the hundreds. The report SRI gave to the Governor ran to eighty-eight
pages.

The proposal was adopted virtually without change by the Alaska legislature in 1970.
Greehan had indeed done a remarkable job for the Committee of 300. From this
beginning SRI developed into an institution employing 4000 people with an annual
budget of $160 million plus. Its President, Charles A. Anderson, has seen much of this
growth during his tenure, as has Professor Willis Harmon, director of the SRI Center for
the Study of Social Policies, employing hundreds of new-science scientists, many of the
top staffers having been transferred from Tavistock’s London base. One of those was
RCA board chair-man and former British intelligence agent, David Sarnoff, who was
closely involved with Harmon and his team for twenty-five years. Sarnoff was something
of a “watchdog” for the mother institute in Sussex.

Stanford claims to make no moral judgments on projects it accepts, working for Israel
and the Arabs, South Africa and Libya but, as one would imagine, by adopting this
attitude it ensures an “inside edge” with foreign governments that the CIA has found most
useful. In Jim Ridgeway’s book, “THE CLOSED CORPORATION,” SRI spokesman
Gibson brags about SRI’s non-discriminatory stance. Although not on the Federal
Contract Research Center lists, SRI is today the largest military think tank, dwarfing
Hudson and Rand. Among SRl’s speciality depart-ments are chemical and biological
warfare experimental centers.

One of Stanford’s more dangerous activities is counter- insurgency operations aimed at
civilian populations–just the sort of “1984” things government is already using against its
own people. The U.S. government pays SRI millions of dollars each year for this kind of

highly controversial “research.” Following student protests against chemical warfare
experiments conducted at Stanford, SRI “sold” itself to a private group for just $25
million. Of course nothing really changed, SRI was still a Tavistock project and the
Committee of 300 still owned it, but the gullible appeared to be satisfied by this
meaningless cosmetic change.

In 1958 a startling new development arose. Advanced Research Products Agency
(ARPA), a contracting agency for the Defense Department, approached SRI with a top
secret proposal. John Foster at the Pentagon told SRI that what was needed was a
program to insure the United States against “technological surprise.” Foster wanted to
perfect a condition where the environment became a weapon; special bombs to trigger
volcanos and/or earthquakes, behavioral research on potential enemies and minerals and
metals with potential for new weapons. The project was accepted by SRI and code-named
“SHAKY.”

The massive electronic brain in SHAKY was capable of carrying out many commands,
its computers having been constructed by IBM for SRI. Twenty-eight scientists worked
on what is called “Human Augmentation.” The IBM computer even has the capability to
solve problems by analogy and recognizes and identifies scientists who work with it. The
“special applications” of this tool can be better imagined than described. Brzezinski knew
what he was talking about when he wrote “THE TECHNOTRONIC ERA.”

Stanford Research Institute works closely with scores of civilian consulting firms, trying
to apply military technology to domestic situations. This has not always been a success,
but as techniques improve, the prospects for massive all-pervading surveillance, as
described by Brzezinski, daily becomes more real. IT ALREADY EXISTS AND IS IN
USE, EVEN THOUGH SLIGHT MALFUNCTIONS FROM TIME TO TIME HAVE
TO BE IRONED OUT. One such civilian consulting firm was Schriever McKee
Associates of McLean, Virginia, run by retired General Bernard A. Schriever, a former
chief of the Air Force Systems Command, who developed the Titan, Thor, Atlas and
Minuteman rockets.

Schriever put together a consortium of Lockheed, Emmerson Electric, Northrop, Control
Data, Raytheon and TRW under the name of URBAN SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.
The purpose of the consortium? To solve social and psychological “urban problems” by
means of military techniques using advanced electronic systems. It is interesting to note
that TRW became the largest credit information collecting company in the creditreporting
business as a result and an outcome of its work with Urban Systems Associates,
Inc.

This should tell us a great deal about just how far this nation is already under TOTAL
SURVEILLANCE, which is the first requirement of the Committee of 300. No
dictatorship, espe-cially not one on a global scale, can function without total control over
each and every individual. SRI was well on its way to becoming a key Committee of 300
research organization.

​

By the 1980’s, 60% of SRl’s contracts were devoted to “Futurism” with both military and
civilian applications. Its ma- jor clients were the U.S. Department of Defense-Directorate
of Defense Research and Engineering, Office of Aerospace Research which dealt with
“Applications of the Behavioral Sciences to Research Management,” Executive Office of
the President, Office of Science and Technology, U.S. Department of Health. On behalf
of the Department of Health, SRI ran a program called “‘Patterns in ESDEA Title I
Reading Achievement Tests.” Other clients were the U.S. Department of Energy, the U.S.
Department of Labor, U.S. Department of Transportation and the National Science
Foundation (NSF). Of significance was the paper developed for NSF, entitled
“Assessment of Future and International Problems.”

Stanford Research, under the tutelage of Tavistock Institute in London, put together a far
reaching and chilling system it called “Business Intelligence Program.” In excess of 600
com- panies in the U.S. and abroad became subscribers. The program covered research in
Japanese Foreign Business Relations, Consumer Marketing in a Period of Change, The
Mounting Challenge of International Terrorism, Sensory Evaluation in Consumer
Products, Electronic Funds Transfer System, Opto-Electric Sensing, Exploratory
Planning Methods, the U.S. Defense In-dustry and Capital Availability. Among the TOP
Committee of 300 companies who became clients of this program were Bechtel
Corporation (George Schultz was on its board), Hewlett Packard, TRW, Bank of
America, Shell Company, RCA, Blyth, Eastman Dillon, Saga Foods Corporation,
McDonnell Douglas, Crown Zellerbach, Wells Fargo Bank and Kaiser Industries.

But one of the most sinister of all SRI programs with the possibilities of doing
tremendous damage in altering the direction in which the United States will go, socially,
morally and religiously, was Stanford’s Charles F. Kettering Foundation’s “CHANGING
IMAGES OF MAN” under Stanford official reference “Contract Number URH (489)-
2150 Policy Research Report Number 4/4/74, Prepared by the SRI Center for the Study
of Social Policy, Director Willis Harmon.” This is probably one of the most far-reaching
investigations into how man might be changed that has ever been conducted.

The report, covering 319 pages, was written by 14 new science scientists under the
supervision of Tavistock and 23 top controllers including B. F. Skinner, Margaret Meade,
Ervin Lazlo and Sir Geoffrey Vickers, a high-level British intelligence officer in M16. It
will be recalled that his son-in-law, Sir Peter Vickers Hall, was a founding member of the
so-called conservative “Heritage Foundation.” Much of the 3000 pages of “recommendations”
given to the Reagan administration in January 1981 were based upon
material taken from Willis Harmon’s “CHANGING IMAGES OF MAN.”

I was privileged to receive a copy of “THE CHANGING IMAGES OF MAN” from my
intelligence colleagues five days after it was accepted by the United States government.
What I read shocked me, as I realized I was looking at a blueprint for a future America,
unlike anything I had ever seen before. The nation was to be programmed to change and
become so accustomed to such planned changes that it would hardly be noticeable when
profound changes did occur. We have gone downhill so fast since “THE AQUARIAN
CONSPIRACY” (the book title of Willis Harmon’s technical paper) was written, that

today, divorce draws no stigma, suicide is at an all time high and raises few eyebrows,
social deviations from the norm and sexual aberrations, once unmentionable in decent
circles, are now commonplace and excite no special protest.

As a nation we have not noticed how “CHANGING IMAGES OF MANKIND” has
radically altered our American way of life forever. Somehow we were overcome by the
“Watergate Syndrome.” For a while we were shocked and dismayed to learn that Nixon
was nothing but a cheap crook who hobnobbed with Earl Warren’s Mafia friends at the
beautiful home they built for him adjoining the Nixon estate. When too many “future
shocks” and news headlines demanded our attention, we lost our way, or rather, the huge
number of choices with which we were and still are daily confronted, confused us to such
a degree that we were no longer able to make the necessary choices.

Worse yet, having been subjected to a barrage of crimes in high places, plus the trauma of
the Vietnam War, our nation seemed no longer to want truths. Such reaction is carefully
explained in Willis Harmon’s technical paper, in short, the American nation was reacting
exactly as profiled. Worse yet, in not wishing to accept truth, we took matters a step
further: We looked to government to shield us from the truth.

The corrupt stench of the Reagan-Bush Administrations we wanted covered with six feet
of earth. The crimes committed under the title of Iran/Contra affair (or scandals), we
didn’t want uncovered. We let our President lie to us regarding his where abouts in the
period October 20-23rd, 1980. Yet these crimes far exceed in quantity and scope
anything Nixon did while he was in office. Do we as a nation recognize it as going
downhill with our brakes off?

No, we do not. When those whose business it is to bring the truth to the American people
that a private, well-organized little government inside the White House was busy
committing one crime after another, crimes which attacked the very soul of this nation
and the republican institutions upon which it rested, we were told not to bother the public
with such things. “We really don’t want to know about all this speculation,” became a
standard response.

When the highest elected official of the land blatantly put U. N. law above the
Constitution of the United States–an impeachible offense, the majority accepted it as
“normal.” When the highest elected official of the land went to war without a
Congressional declaration of war, the fact was censored out by the news media and,
again, we accepted it rather than face the truth.

When the Gulf War, which our President plotted and planned, began, not only were we
happy with censorship of the most blatant kind, we even took it to our hearts, believing
that it was “good tor the war effort.” Our President lied, April Glaspie lied, the State
Department lied. They said the war was justified because President Hussein had been
warned to leave Kuwait alone. When Glaspie’s cables to the State Department were
finally made public, one United States Senator after another went charging to defend

Glaspie, the harlot. It mattered not that they came from both the Democrats and the
Republicans. We, the people, let them get away with their vile lies.

In this public attitude of the American people, the wildest dreams of Willis Harmon and
his teams of scientists became a reality. The Tavistock Institute was elated at its success
in destroying the self respect and self esteem of this once great nation. We are told that
we won the Gulf War. What is not yet perceived by the vast majority of Americans is
that, in winning the war, it cost the self respect and honor of our nation. That lies rotting
in the desert sands of Kuwait and Iraq, alongside the corpses of the Iraqi soldiers we
butchered in the agreed retreat from Kuwait and Basra–we could not keep our word that
we would abide by the Geneva Conventions and not attack them. “What do you want,”
our controllers asked us, “victory or self respect? You can’t have both.”

One hundred years ago, this could not have happened, but now it has happened and
excites no comment. We have succumbed to the long range penetration warfare waged
against this nation by Tavistock. Like the German nation, defeated by the Prudential
Bombing Survey, enough of us have succumbed to make this nation the kind that
totalitarian regimes of the past would have only envisaged in their dreams. “Here,” they
would say, “is a nation, one of the largest in the world, that doesn’t want the truth. All of
our propaganda agencies can be dispensed with. We don’t have to struggle to keep the
truth from this nation, they have willingly rejected it of their own volition. This nation is
a pushover.”

Our once proud Republic of the United States of America became no more than a series
of criminal front organizations, which history shows is always the start of totalitarianism.
This is the stage of permanent alteration we are at in America as 1991 drew to a close.
We live in a throw-away society, programmed not to last. We do not even flinch at the 4
million homeless nor the 30 million jobless, nor the 15 million babies murdered thus far.
They are “throw-aways” of the Age of Aquarius, a conspiracy so damnable that, when
first confronted with it, the majority will disavow its existence, rationalizing these events
as “times have changed.”

This is how the Tavistock Institute and Willis Harmon programmed us to react.
Dismantling of our ideals goes on without protest. The spiritual and intellectual drive of
our people has been destroyed! On May 27th, 1991, President Bush made a very
profound statement, the thrust of which appears to have been totally misused by most
political commentators:

“The moral dimension of American policy requires us to chart a moral course through a
world of lesser evils. That is the real world, not black and white. Very few moral
absolutes.”

What else could we expect from a President who is most probably the most evil man ever
to occupy the White House?

​

Consider this in the light of his order to the military to bury alive 12,000 Iraqi soldiers.
Consider this in the light of his ongoing war of genocide against the Iraqi people.
President Bush was delighted to characterize President Saddam Hussein as the “Hitler of
our times.” He never bothered to offer a single scrap of proof. It was not needed. Because
President Bush made the statement, we accepted it without question. Consider this in the
bright light of truth, that he did all of these things in the name of the American people
while secretly taking his orders from the Committee of 300.

But, more than anything else, consider this: President Bush and his controllers feel so
secure that they no longer deem it necessary to hide their evil control of the American
people, or to lie about it. This is self-evident in the statement that he, as our leader, will
make all manner of compromises with truth, honesty and decency if his controllers (and
ours) deem it necessary. On May 27th, 1991, the President of the United States
abandoned each and every principle embodied in our Constitution and boldly proclaimed
that he was no longer bound by it. This is a great victory for the Tavistock Institute and
the Prudential Bombing Survey, whose target changed from German worker housing in
1945 to the soul of the American people in a war that began in 1946 and runs through to
1992.

Increased pressure on this nation for change was applied by Stanford Research Institute
in the early 1960’s. SRl’s offensive gathered power and momentum. Switch on your
television set and you will see Stanford’s victory in front of your very eyes: talk shows
featuring heavy sexual details, special video channels where perversion, rock and roll and
drugs reign supreme. Where once John Wayne ruled, we now have a made-over apology
for a man (or is he?) called Michael Jackson, a parody of a human being who is held up
as a hero, as he gyrates, shuffles, mumbles and screams his way across television screens
in millions of American homes.

A woman who has been through a series of marriages gets national coverage. One filthy,
half-washed drug-ridden deca-lent rock band after another has hours of air time devoted
to its inane sounds and mad gyrations, clothes fashions and language aberrations. Soap
operas showing as near as “dammit” is to wearing pornographic scenes draw no
comment. Whereas in early 1960 this would never have been tolerated, today it is
accepted as normal. We have been subjected and we have succumbed to what Tavistock
Institute calls “future shocks” whose future is NOW and we are so numbed by one
cultural shock after another that to protest seems like a futile gesture and, therefore,
logically we think, it does no good to protest.

In 1986 the Committee of 300 ordered the pressure turned up. The U.S. was not going
down fast enough. The United States began the process of “recognizing” the butchers of
Cambodia, the criminal Pol Pot regime, self confessors to the murder of 2 million
Cambodian citizens. In 1991, the wheel turned the full circle. The United States went to
war against a friendly nation that had been programmed to trust the Washington traitors.
We accused President Hussein of the small nation of Iraq of all manner of evil, NONE
OF WHICH WAS EVEN REMOTELY TRUE. We killed and maimed its children, we
left them to starve and to die of all manner of diseases.

​

In the same breath we sent the Bush emissaries of the Committee of 300 to Cambodia to
RECOGNIZE THE EVIL MASS MURDERERS OF 2 MILLION CAMBODIANS, who
were sacrificed by the Committee of 300’s depopulation of cities experiment, which the
big cities of the United States will experience in the not too distant future. Now, President
Bush and his Committee of 300-ridden administration say, in effect, “Look people, what
do you want from me? I told you that I will compromise where I see fit, even when that
means sleeping with the Pol Pot murderers. SO WHAT– KISS MY HIPS.”

The level of pressure for change will reach its peak in 1993 and we shall witness scenes
such as we would never have thought possible. Punch drunk America will react, but ever
so slightly. Not even the latest threat to our freedom, the personal computer card disturbs
us. Willis Harman’s “CHANGING IMAGES OF MAN” would have been too technical
for most so the service of Marilyn Ferguson was obtained to make it more easily
understood. “THE AGE OF AQUARIUS” heralded nude stage shows and a song which
made the top of the charts: “The Dawning of the Age of the Aquarius” swept the globe.

The personal computer card which, when fully distributed, will deprive us of our familiar
environment and, as we shall see, environment means a lot more than the usually
accepted meaning of the word. The United States has gone through a period of intense
trauma such as has never been visited on any other nation in the history of the world, and
the worst is yet to come.

Everything is going according to what Tavistock ordered and what the social scientists at
Stanford mapped out. Times do not change; they are made to change. All changes are
preplanned and come as the result of careful action. We have been changed gradually at
first, but now the pace of change is picking up. The United States is being transformed
from One Nation Under God to a polyglot of nations under several gods. The U.S. is no
longer One nation under God. The framers of the Constitution have lost the battle.

Our forebears spoke a common language and believed in a common religion Christianity,
and held common ideals. There were no aliens in our midst; that came later in a
deliberately planned attempt to break up the United States into a series of fragmented
nationalities, cultures and beliefs. If you doubt this, go down to the East Side of New
York, or the West Side of Los Angeles on any given Saturday and look around you. The
United States has become several nations struggling to coexist under a common system
of government. When the floodgates of immigration were opened wide by Franklin D.
Roosevelt, a cousin of the head of the Committee of 300, the cultural shock caused great
confusion and dislocation and made “One Nation” an unworkable concept. The Club of
Rome and NATO have exacerbated the situation. “Love thy neighbor” is an ideal that
will not work unless your neighbor “is as yourself.”

To the framers of our Constitution, the truths they laid out For future generations were
“self evident”–to themselves Being unsure that future generations would also find the
truths to which they bound this nation self evident, THEY SET ABOUT SPELLlNG
THEM OUT. IT SEEMS THAT THEY WERE AFRAID OF A TIME THAT MIGHT
COME WHEN THE TRUTHS THEY ESPOUSED WOULD NO LONGER BE SELF

EVIDENT. The Tavistock Institute for Human Relations has made sure that what the
framers feared might come to pass has indeed come to pass. That time has arrived with
Bush and his “no absolutes” and his New World Order under the Committee of 300.

This is part of the concept of social changes forced upon Americans which Harmon and
the Club of Rome said would make for severe trauma and a great building up of pressure.
The social upheavals that have taken place since the advent of Tavistock, the Club of
Rome and NATO will continue in the U.S. for as long as the limit of absorption is
ignored. Nations are made up of individuals and, like individuals, there is a limit to their
ability to absorb changes, no matter how robust they may be.

This psychological truth was well proven by the Strategic Bombing Survey which called
for saturation bombing of German worker housing. As mentioned earlier, the project was
the work of the Prudential Insurance Company and no one doubts today that Germany
suffered its defeat because of this operation. Many of the scientists who worked on that
project are working on saturation bombing of America, or else they have passed on,
leaving their skilled techniques in the hands of others who followed behind them.

The legacy they left behind them can be found in the fact that we have not so much lost
our way as a nation, but that we have been steered in a direction opposite to that which
the framers of the Declaration guided us for over 200 years. We have, in short, lost
contact with our historical genes, our faith, which inspired countless generations of
Americans to move forward as a nation, benefiting from the patrimony left to us by the
framers of the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution. That we
are lost is clear to all who seek the truth, as unpleasant as it may be.

With President Bush and his “no absolute morals” guiding us, we blunder ahead as lost
nations and individuals tend to do. We are collaborating with the Committee of 300 for
our own downfall and our own enslavement. Some sense it– and feel a strong sense of
unease. The various conspiracy theories they are familiar with do not seem to cover it all.
This is because they know nothing of the Conspirators’Hierarchy, The Committee of 300.

These souls who feel a deep sense of unease and that some- thing is radically wrong, yet
cannot put their collective fingers on the problem, walk in darkness. They look to a future
they see slipping away from them. The American dream has become a mirage. They
place their faith in religion but take no steps to help that faith along by ACTION.
Americans will never experience a retracing of steps such as the Europeans experienced
when at the height of the Dark Ages. By determined ACTlON, they awoke in themselves
a spirit of renewal which resulted in the glorious Renaissance.

The enemy that has directed them to this point decided to make a strong move against the
United States in 1980, so that Renaissance of America would be impossible. Who is the
enemy? The enemy is no faceless “they.” The enemy is clearly identifiable as the
Committee of 300, the Club of Rome, NATO and all of its affiliated organizations, the
think tanks and research institutions controlled by Tavistock. There is no need to use
“they” or “the enemy” except as shorthand. WE KNOW WHO “THEY, ” THE ENEMY,

IS. The Committee of 300 with its Eastern Liberal Establishment “aristocracy,” its banks,
insurance companies, giant corporations, foundations, communications networks,
presided over by a HIERARCHY OF CONSPIRATORS–THIS IS THE ENEMY.

This is the power that brought to life the reign of terror in Russia, the Bolshevik
Revolution, World Wars I and II, Korea, Vietnam, the fall of Rhodesia, South Africa,
Nicaragua, and the Philippines. This is the secret upper-level government that brought
into existence the controlled disintegration of the U.S. economy and deindustrialized
what was once the greatest indusrial power, for good, that the world had ever known.

America today can be compared with a soldier who falls asleep in the thick of battle. We
Americans have fallen asleep, given way to apathy caused by being confronted with a
multplicity of choices which has confused us. These are the changes that alter our
environment, break down our resistance to change so that we become dazed, apathetic
and eventually fall asleep in the thick of battle.

There is a technical term for this condition. It is called “long range penetration strain.”
The art of subjecting a very large group of people to continued long range penetration
strain was developed by scientists working out of the Tavistock Institute of Human
Relations and their U. S. subsidiaries, Stanford Research and Rand Corporation, and at
least another 150 research institu-tions here in the U.S.

Dr. Kurt Lewin, the scientist who developed this fiendish warfare, has caused the average
American patriot to fret over various conspiracy theories, leaving him or her with a
feeling of uncertainty and insecurity, isolated and perhaps even afraid, as he searches, but
fails to understand the decay and rot caused by “THE CHANGING IMAGES OF
MANKIND,” unable to identify or combat the social, moral, economic and political
changes he deems undesirable and does not want, yet which increase in intensity on every
hand.

Dr. Lewin’s name will not be found in any of our establish- ment history books which, in
any event, are a record of events mostly from the side of the ruling class or the victors of
wars. Therefore, it is with pride that I introduce his name to you. As mentioned before,
Dr. Lewin organized the Harvard Psychological Clinic and the Institute for Social
Research under the auspices of the Tavistock Institute. The names do not give much
indication of the purpose of the two organizations.

This reminds me of the infamous bill to reform coinage and mint laws passed in 1827.
The title of the bill was harmless enough or sounded harmless, which was the intention of
its backers. Through this Act, Senator John Sherman betrayed the nation into the hands of
the international bankers. Sherman allegedly sponsored the bill “without reading it.” As
we know, the bill’s true purpose was to demonetize silver and give the thieving bankers
unlimited power over the credit of our nation; powers to which the bankers were clearly
not entitled under the clear and unmistakable terms of the U.S. Constitution.

​

Kurt Lewin gave the Tavistock Institute, the Club of Rome and NATO unlimited power
over America, to which no organization, entity or society is entitled. These institutions
have used the usurped powers to destroy the will of the nation to resist the plans and
intentions of the conspirators to rob us of the fruits of the American Revolution and steer
us on a course leading directly to a New Dark Ages under a One World Government.

Lewin’s colleagues in this long range penetration objective were Richard Crossman, Eric
Trist, H. V. Dicks, Willis Harmon, Charles Anderson, Garner Lindsay, Richard Price and
W. R. Bion. Again, these names never appear in the evening news; in fact, they only
appear in scientific journals–so very few Ameri-cans are aware of them and not at all
aware of what the men behind the names have done and are doing to the United States.
President Jefferson once said he pitied those who thought they knew what was taking
place through reading the newspaper. Disraeli, the British prime minister, said much the
same thing. Indeed, down through the ages, rulers have delighted in running things from
behind the scenes. Man has always felt the need to dominate and nowhere and at no time
is the desire more prevalent than in this modern era.

If it were not so, why all the need for secret societies? If we are ruled by an open system
run by democratically elected officials, why the need for a secret Masonic order in every
village, town and city across the United States? How is it that Freemasonry can operate
so openly and yet keep its secrets so well hidden? We can’t ask the Nine Unknown Men
of the Nine Sisters Lodge in Paris that question, nor can we ask it of their nine fellows in
the Quatuar Coronati Lodge in London. Yet these eighteen men form part of an even
more secret govern-ment, the RIIA, and beyond that, the Committee of 300.

How is it that the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry could brain-wash John Hinckley to shoot
President Reagan? Why do we have such secret orders as the Knights of St. John of
Jerusalem, the Round Table, the Milner Group and so on down line upon line of secret
societies? They form part of a world-wide chain of command and control running
through the Club of Rome, NATO, the RIIA and finally right up to the Conspirators’
Hierarchy, The Committee of 300. Men need these secret societies because their deeds
are evil and must be hidden. Evil cannot stand in the light of truth.

In this book we shall find an almost complete list of the conspirators, their institutions,
fronts and publications. In 1980 the Aquarian Conspiracy was in full swing and its
success can be seen in every facet of our private and national life. The overwhelming rise
in mindless violence, serial killers, teenage suicides, the unmistakable signs of lethargy–
“long range peetration” is a part of our new environment, as dangerous, if not more so,
than the polluted air that we breathe.

The coming of the Age of Aquarius caught America totally unprepared. We as a nation
were not prepared for the changes about to be forced upon us. Who ever had heard of
Tavistock, Kurt Lewin, Willis Harmon and John Rawlings Reese? They were not even on
the American political scene. What we would have noticed, if we bothered to look at all,
was a falling off of our ability to withstand futuristic shock as we became more fatigued,

distressed and eventually entered a period of psychological shock followed by
widespread apathy as an outward manifestation of long range penetration warfare.

The Age of Aquarius was best described by Tavistock Institute as the vehicle for
delivering turbulence: “There are three distinct phases in the response and reaction to
stress displayed by large social groups. First, there is superficiality; the population under
attack will defend itself with slogans; this does not identify the source of the crisis and
therefore does nothing to address it, hence the crisis will persist. The second is
fragmentation. This occurs as the crisis continues and social order breaks down. Then,
there is the third phase where the population group goes into ‘self realization’ and turns
away from the induced crisis and there follows a maladaptive response, accompanied
with active synoptic idealism and disassociation.”

Who can deny that with the huge increase in drug usage– “crack” making thousands of
instant new addicts each day–the shocking rise in the murder of infants each day
(aborticide), which by now far exceeds casualties suffered by our armed forces in both
World Wars, Korea and Vietnam, the open acceptance of homosexuality and lesbianism
whose “rights” are protected by more and more laws each year, the terrible plague we call
“AIDS” washing over our towns and cities, total failure of our education system, the
stunning increase in the divorce rate, a murder rate that shocks the rest of the world into
disbelief, satanic serial killings, the disappearance of thousands of young children,
snatched off our streets by perverts, a virtual tidal wave of pornography accompanied by
“permissiveness” on our television screens–who can deny that this nation is in crisis,
which we are not addressing and from which we are turning away.

Well-meaning people who specialize in these things blame a lot of the problem on
education, or what passes for it in the United States. Criminals now abound in the age
groups 9-15. Rapists are quite commonly as young as 10. Our social specialists, our
teacher’s unions, our churches say it is all due to a faulty education system. Witness how
test scores keep dropping. The specialists bewail the fact that the United States now ranks
around 39th in the level of education in the world.

Why do we bemoan what is so obvious? OUR EDUCATlON SYSTEM WAS
PROGRAMMED TO SELF-DESTRUCT. THAT WAS WHAT DR. ALEXANDER
KING WAS SENT HERE BY NATO TO ARRANGE. THAT IS WHAT JUSTICE
HUGO BLACK WAS ORDERED TO ARRANGE. THE FACT IS, THE COMMITTEE
OF 300, WITH THE APPROVAL OF OUR GOVERNMENT, DOES NOT WANT
OUR YOUTH TO BE PROPERLY EDUCATED. The education that Freemason Justice
Hugo Black, Alexander King, Gunnar Myrdal and his wife came to give the children of
the United States is that CRIME PAYS, EXPEDIENCY IS WHAT COUNTS.

They taught our children that United States law is unequally applied, and that is perfectly
in order. Our children were properly educated by a decade of corrupt examples; Ronald
Reagan and George Bush were ruled by greed and became totally corrupted by it. Our
education system hasn’t failed. Under the guidance of King, Black and the Myrdals it is
actually a great success, but it all depends from whose point of view we look at it. The

Committee of 300 is DELIGHTED with our education system, and will not allow one
comma of it to be changed.

According to Stanford and Willis Harmon, the induced trauma of long range penetration
of which our education is a part, has been going on for 45 years, yet how many are aware
of the insidious pressures being applied to our society and the constant exposure to
brainwashing that goes on every day? The mysterious gang wars that broke out in New
York in the 1950’s is an example of how the conspirators can create and stage-manage
any type of disruptive elements they like. Where those gang wars came from nobody
knew until the 1980’s when researchers uncovered the hidden controllers who directed
the so–called “social phenomena.”

Gang wars were carefully planned at Stanford, deliberately designed to shock society and
cause ripples of disturbances. By 1958 there were in excess of 200 of these gangs. They
were made popular by a musical and a Hollywood movie, “West Side Story.” After
making the news for a decade, suddenly, in 1966, they disappeared off the streets of New
York, Los Angeles New York, New Jersey, Philadelphia and Chicago.

Throughout the near decade of gang violence, the public reacted according to the profiled
response Stanford expected; society as a whole could not comprehend gang warfare and
the public responded in a maladaptive manner. Had there been those wise enough to
recognize in gang wars a Stanford experi-ment in social engineering and brainwashing,
the conspirator’s plot would have been exposed. Either we did not have trained specialists
who could see what was going on–which is highly unlikely–or else they were threatened
and remained silent. The cooperation with Stanford by the news media brought to light a
“new age” attack on our environment just as predicted by the social engineers and newscience
scientists at Tavistock.

In 1989 gang warfare, as a social conditioning to change, was reintroduced to the streets
of Los Angeles. Within a few short months of the first incidents, gangs began to
proliferate– first in the scores, then in the hundreds on the streets of the East Side of Los
Angeles. Crack houses and rampant prostitution proliferated; drug dealers dominated the
streets. Anybody who got in their way was gunned down. The outcry in the press was
loud and long. Stanford’s targeted large population group began defending itself with
slogans. This is what Tavistock called the first phase, with the targeted group failing to
identify the source of the crisis.

The second phase of the gang war crisis was “fragmentation.” People not living in the
areas frequented by gangs said, “Thank God they are not in our neighborhood.” This
ignored the fact that the crisis continued with or without recognition and that social order
in Los Angeles had begun to break down. As profiled by Tavistock, those groups not
affected by gang war “broke away to defend themselves” because the source of the crisis
was not identified, the so called “maladaptation” process the period of disassociation.

Apart from the proliferation of drug sales, what is the purpose of gang wars? First, it is to
show the targeted group that they are not safe, i.e., insecurity is generated. Secondly, it is

​

​

​

​

​